Strawberry Hill: A Gothic Fantasy

Strawberry Hill House, often referred to simply as Strawberry Hill, is the Gothic Revival villa that was built in Twickenham, London by Horace Walpole beginning in 1749. It is the type example of the “Strawberry Hill Gothic” style of architecture, and it prefigured the nineteenth-century Gothic revival. Walpole, an author in his own right (among many other things) was said to have been inspired by his home, to write the  novel, “The Castle of Otranto” generally regarded as the first gothic novel.

800px-Strawberry_Hill_House_from_garden_in_2012_after_restoration

Strawberry Hill House in 2012 after restoration

Walpole rebuilt the existing house in stages starting in 1749, 1760, 1772 and 1776. These modifications added gothic features such as towers and battlements outside and elaborate decoration inside to create “gloomth” to suit Walpole’s collection of antiquarian objects, contrasting with the “riant” (smiling) garden. The interior included a Robert Adam fireplace; parts of the exterior were designed by James Essex. The garden contained a large seat shaped like a Rococo sea shell.

The Robert Adam fireplace in the round room.

The Robert Adam fireplace in the round room.

In May 1747 Horace Walpole took a lease on a small 17th-century house that was “little more than a cottage”, with 5 acres (20,000 m2) of land from a Mrs. Chenevix. The following year he purchased the house which the original owner, a coachman, had named “Chopped Straw Hall”. This was intolerable to Walpole, “his residence ought, he thought, to possess some distinctive appellation; of a very different character…” Finding an old lease that described his land as “Strawberry Hill Shot”, Walpole adopted this new name for his soon to be “elegant villa”.

A tower at Strawberry Hill

A tower at Strawberry Hill

In stages, Walpole rebuilt the house to his own specifications, giving it a Gothic style and expanding the property to 46 acres (190,000 m2) over the years. As Rosemary Hill notes, “Strawberry Hill was the first house without any existing medieval fabric to be [re]built from scratch in the Gothic style and the first to be based on actual historic examples, rather than an extrapolation of the Gothic vocabulary first developed by William Kent. As such it has a claim to be the starting point of the Gothic Revival.”

Walpole and two friends, including the connoisseur and amateur architect, John Chute (1701–1776), and draughtsman and designer, Richard Bentley (1708–1782), called themselves a “Committee of Taste” or “Strawberry Committee” which would modify the architecture of the building. Bentley left the group abruptly after an argument in 1761. Chute had an “eclectic but rather dry style” and was in charge of designing most of the exterior of the house and some of the interior. To Walpole, he was an “oracle of taste”. Walpole often disagreed with Bentley on some of his wayward schemes, but admired his talent for illustration.

An 18th-century engraving of the villa

An 18th-century engraving of the villa

William Robinson of the Royal Office of Works contributed professional experience in overseeing construction. They looked at many examples of architecture in England and in other countries, adapting such works as the chapel at Westminster Abbey built by Henry VII for inspiration for the fan vaulting of the gallery, without any pretence at scholarship. Chimney-pieces were improvised from engravings of tombs at Westminster and Canterbury and Gothic stone fretwork blind details were reproduced by painted wallpapers, while in the Round Tower added in 1771, the chimney-piece was based on the tomb of Edward the Confessor “improved by Mr. Adam”.

He incorporated many of the exterior details of cathedrals into the interior of the house. Externally there seemed to be two predominant styles ‘mixed'; a style based on castles with turrets and battlements, and a style based on Gothic cathedrals with arched windows and stained glass.

The building evolved similarly to how a medieval cathedral often evolved over time, with no fixed plan from the beginning. Indeed, Michael Snodin argues, “the most striking external feature of Strawberry Hill was its irregular plan and broken picturesque silhouette”. Walpole added new features over a thirty-year period, as he saw fit.

The first stage to make, in Walpole’s words, a ‘little Gothic castle’ began in 1749 and was complete by 1753, a second stage began in 1760, and there were other modifications such as work on the great north bedchamber in 1772, and the “Beauclerk Tower” of the third phase of alterations, completed to designs of a professional architect, James Essex, in 1776. The total cost came to about £20,720.

Walpole’s ‘little Gothic castle’ has significance as one of the most influential individual buildings of such Rococo “Gothick” architecture which prefigured the later developments of the nineteenth century Gothic revival, and for increasing the use of Gothic designs for houses. This style has variously been described as Georgian Gothic, Strawberry Hill Gothic, or Georgian Rococo.

Blaise Castle, in Bristol.

Blaise Castle, in Bristol.

Strawberry Hill would soon become a tourist destination, like the similarly styled Blaise Castle, of Northanger Abbey fame.

“Blaize Castle!” cried Catherine; “what is that?”
“The finest place in England – worth going fifty miles at any time to see.”
“What, is it really a castle, an old castle?”
“The oldest in the kingdom.”
“But is it like what one reads of?”
“Exactly – the very same.”
“But now really – are there towers and long galleries?”
“By dozens.”
-Northanger Abbey

Walpole’s eccentric and unique style on the inside rooms of Strawberry Hill complemented the Gothic exterior. The house is described by Walpole as “the scene that inspired, the author of The Castle of Otranto, though Michael Snodin has observed: “it is an interesting comment on 18th-century sensibility that the melancholy interiors of The Castle of Otranto were suggested by the light, elegant, even whimsical rooms at Strawberry Hill”.

The interiors of Walpole’s “little play-thing house” were intended to be “settings of Gothic ‘gloomth’ for Walpole’s collection”. His collection of curious, singular, antiquarian objects was well publicized; Walpole himself published two editions of A Description of the Villa of Mr. Horace Walpole at Strawberry Hill to make the “world aware of the extent of his collection”.

sh-000549

Speaking on Walpole’s collection, Clive Wainwright states that Walpole’s collection “constituted an essential part of the interiors of his house”. The character of the rooms at Strawberry Hill was “created and dictated” by Walpole’s taste for antiquarianism. Though even without the collection present, the house “retains a fairy-tale quality”.

Horace Walpole’s Strawberry Hill Collection of several thousand items can still be viewed today. The Lewis Walpole Library of Yale University now has a database which “encompasses the entire range of art and artifacts from Walpole’s collections, including all items whose location is currently known and those as yet untraced but known through a variety of historical records”.

The gardens at Strawberry Hill.

The gardens at Strawberry Hill.

Walpole was as meticulous in designing and developing his gardens as he was improving his house, though “his ignorance of horticulture at first embarrassed him a little”. Improvements on the grounds were started even before work on the house. In an essay titled “On Modern Gardening“, Walpole expresses his own ideas as reflected in his Strawberry Hill grounds. Walpole’s taste in landscape and gardening moved away from the traditional, formal layout of “parterre, terraces, marble urns, statued fountains and ‘canals measured by the line'”. The French or Italian taste seemed, to Walpole, alien to the English climate “resulting in symmetrical and unnatural gardens”. Trees and shrubs were planted in “natural groupings” on the lawn. Walpole preferred to see all nature as a garden. He did not however appreciate the extravagant “romantic grotto and that favorite eighteenth-century conceit, the hermitage”.

The fairest scenes, that depend on themselves alone, weary when often seen. The Doric portico, the Palladian bridge, the Gothic ruin, the Chinese pagoda, that surprise the stranger, soon lose their charms to their surfeited master. But the ornament whose merit soonest fades, is the hermitage, or scene adapted to contemplation. It is almost comic to set aside a quarter of one’s garden to be melancholy in.
-On Modern Gardening

Here, Walpole’s separation of style between his house and grounds can be seen. A friend, Horace Mann, assumed that Walpole’s garden would be similarly Gothic. Walpole responded “Gothic is merely architecture, and as one has a satisfaction in imprinting the gloomth of abbeys and cathedrals on one’s house, so one’s garden, on the contrary, is to be nothing but riant, and the gaiety of nature”.

Walpole saw the modern English garden as a point of perfection: “We have given the true model of gardening to the world; let other countries mimic or corrupt our taste; but let it reign here on its verdant throne, original by its elegant simplicity, and proud of no other art than that of softening nature’s harshness and copying her graceful touch”. He was a follower of William Kent, one of the originators of the English landscape garden.

One particular attraction of Walpole’s gardens was a garden seat carved to resemble a large Rococo style sea shell. “This shell was one of Mr. Walpole’s favourite inventions – for Strawberry Hill was crammed with inventions and contrivances. It was a seat in the form of a huge bivalve of a species not easily recognized, which generally elicited a vast amount of wonder and admiration from his visitors”. This bench, a rustic cottage, and a chapel in the woods were not follies like a ruin or hermitage, but including these items in his otherwise natural gardens shows Walpole’s charmingly eccentric taste.

While the original garden seat has disappeared, sketches made at the time of its construction still exist.

While the original garden seat has disappeared, sketches made at the time of its construction still exist.

The seat was originally placed at the corner of the Walpole’s Estate, facing towards the river and from this position Walpole and his visitors could view the Thames and the borrowed landscape beyond. Although only two drawings of the original bench survive, “the garden is as far as possible being restored to its original appearance. Walpole’s extraordinary Shell Bench has been recreated” according to the Strawberry Hill website.

Even in Walpole’s lifetime, Strawberry Hill drew many visitors to admire the architecture, grounds, and Walpole’s carefully cultivated collection. According to Elliot Warburton, “Strawberry Hill in its new form soon became the marvel of the neighbourhood – a little later became the town talk – in a short time a theme of frequent comment even in distant parts of the country”. “The highest personages of the realm” including the royal family came to visit Strawberry Hill, as well as more common sightseers. These visitors became an incessant addition to Strawberry Hill, and as delighted as Walpole was to share his vision, they became a bit of a nuisance to him. While Walpole gave tours to the more important visitors, he shrank from less dignified attention and “retreated to his cottage in the flower garden” while his housekeeper gave tours to the public.

In a letter to Horace Mann in 1763, Walpole complained: “I have but a minute’s time in answering your letter, my house is full of people, and has been so from the instant I breakfasted, and more are coming; in short, I keep an inn; the sign ‘The Gothic Castle’ …my whole time is passed in giving tickets for seeing it, and hiding myself when it is seen. Take my advice, never build a charming house for yourself between London and Hampton-court: everybody will live in it but you”. Warburton notes that while Walpole may have been annoyed from time to time, he also came to see his estate contributing to the public’s enjoyment when he had doubts about his endeavour. “He arrives at the conclusion that all he has done is for the benefit of others rather than for himself”.


From Wikipedia.com

Facebook Twitter Email Stumbleupon
This entry was posted in Landscape and Property, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Have a very Merry Christmas this year with Mr Darcy on your tree!



  • Jane Austen Giftshop

  • Jane Austen Newsletter

  • Jane Austen in Bath

  • Jane Austen iPhone App

  • ArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchEnglishFrenchGermanHindiJapaneseRussianSpanish
Powered By Mow - Wordpress Popup Plugin