Posted on

D’Arcy Wentworth: Heroic Inspiration?


Jane Austen’s Aunt was once at risk of transportation to Botany Bay for shoplifting. It is piquant that Austen

named two of her major male characters Fitzwilliam Darcy in Pride and Prejudice and Captain Wentworth in

Persuasion, because a leading inhabitant of New South Wales in those years was D’Arcy Wentworth,

disreputable but acknowledged kinsman of Lord Fitzwilliam. D’Arcy Wentworth’s career smacks more of Georgette Heyer

than Jane Austen, since he was a highwayman four times acquitted. Rather than push his luck further, he went, a

free man, as assistant surgeon with the Second Fleet in 1790. As a young teenager Jane Austen may have read about

him in the Times.

Remembered in Australian history, his origins somewhat fudged, as father of the better-known W.C. Wentworth, D’Arcy

turns out to be a complex and significant character. All his life he was an outsider. Born in Ireland in 1762, he

was the youngest son of a Protestant innkeeper whose family had come down in the world. D’Arcy qualified as an

assistant surgeon in London, but then gravitated to vice and crime; through flash arrogance, Ritchie thinks, rather

than a self-destructive urge.

Once in Australia, Wentworth spent his first six years on Norfolk Island, the margin of marginalised New South

Wales. Back in Sydney, he still seemed too raffish for intimacy with the New South Wales Corps clique, the

Macarthurs and their like. Because of his professional skills and an economic clout built up through trade, notably

in rum, Wentworth could not be ignored. Walking alone, he trod delicately through the feuds and alliances which

culminated in Governor Bligh’s overthrow in 1808.

Bligh had suspended Wentworth for allegedly using government prisoners on his own private projects; so it was not

surprising that Wentworth sided with Macarthur and the men of property who made the Rum Rebellion. But he did not

draw too close to them, and when Governor Macquarie arrived in 1810 Wentworth soon won favour with him.

By the end of 1810 the erstwhile outcast was principal surgeon, justice of the peace, commissioner for turnpike

roads, and superintendent of police — the last appointment beginning a venerable New South Wales tradition of

contentious appointments. Not surprisingly in one who learned his political ethics in eighteenth century Ireland,

Wentworth tended to be a lax and negligent administrator, happy to leave the work to subordinates while he got on

with the serious business of enriching himself. Except when his business interests brought out the bully in him he

was a humane justice who punished leniently. He weathered the criticisms following Commissioner Bigge’s reports in

the early 1820s. When a court of quarter session was set up in 1824 he would have been its chairman but for failing

health. Not bad for an ex-highwayman.

Success in the cut-throat business and factional politics of early New South Wales often depended on the quality of

aristocratic influence which could be brought to bear in London. Where Macarthur had to exert himself in courting

Lord Camden or Sir Joseph Banks, Wentworth had the inside running through his shadowy kinship with Lord

Fitzwilliam. In addition to direct patronage, Wentworth had access to the earl’s London agent, the long-suffering

and trustworthy Charles Cookney, who looked after commercial matters and fostered Wentworth’s sons when they were

sent to England for education.

These sons were the children of the convict Catherine Crowley, Wentworth’s common law wife until her death in 1800.

He never married, but through serial monogamy produced at least twelve children, the last born some months after

his death, aged sixty-five, in 1827. The eldest son, William Charles, was the apple of D’Arcy’s eye, and some of

Ritchie’s subtlest and most telling insights chart the changing relationship between father and son.

Where D’Arcy was cool, diplomatic, and rationally self-interested — a gentleman of the road, maybe, but still a

gentleman — William was roughshod, Byronic, and passionate. The father compartmentalised his life with almost

chilling efficiency. He never wrote to his Irish family and seldom allowed personal rancour to interfere with

business. In William’s character private and public motives fused stormily. He fought the Macarthurs not just

because they were powerful, but because they snubbed his courtship of their sister.
Geoffrey Bolton is Senior Scholar in Residence at Murdoch University. This article originally appeared in

The Australian Book Review (June, 1998) and is reprinted with their permission. Further information about the D’Arcy family can be found in The

Wentworths: Father and Son, by John Ritchie (ISBN: 1 522 84751 X).

Want to read the full article?

Sign up for free Jane Austen Membership or if you are an existing user please login

Existing Users Log In
Sign up here to become a Jane Austen member
*Required field