Posted on

Jane Austen News – Issue 82

What’s the Jane Austen News this week?  

Could You Play Jane in Austen the Musical?

Exciting news if you love musical theatre, have a passion for performing and have always wanted to be Jane Austen. The Jane Austen News is that there's a hunt for a new Jane!Producers Daniel Taylor-Brown and Justin Eade have announced that they’re looking for an actress to play Jane Austen in the UK tour of Austen the Musical.

Austen the Musical explores Jane’s struggle to have her work published in a male dominated environment, her romances, and her vow to reject a woman’s lifestyle in Georgian England. Following extended runs at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe, and sell-out performances at the Jane Austen Festival and York New Musical Festival, the new musical by Rob Winlow is heading nationwide on its 2017/18 UK Tour from October 2017 – only it’s currently lacking it’s leading lady!

So, interested in playing Jane Austen from age 20-41? We thought a few of you in our Jane Austen News readership might be. To apply, the producers are asking for a CV, headshot, covering letter, and details of your vocal range to be sent to them at info@austenthemusical.com. More info can be found at the listing here on artsjobs.org.uk.

 


Meet The Jane Austen Superfans

At the Jane Austen News we love reading about other fans of Austen, so we really enjoyed finding out a bit more about these Jane Austen superfans as featured in an article in the Guardian this week:

Roland Anderson, 44, finance director, London:
“It wasn’t until I was in my 20s that I started getting into Austen. My friend Mark kept going on about Pride And Prejudice, so I reread it, then worked my way through the rest of the novels, plus anything I could get my hands on: the letters, the unfinished novels. Once I read a boyfriend Pride And Prejudice as a bedtime story. It doesn’t take as long as you think – 20 nights at two or three chapters a night. He really liked it, even if the relationship didn’t last.”

Nili Olay, 72, and Jerry Vetowich, 80, members of the Jane Austen Society of North America:

Jerry – “I love the dressing-up, I admit – I’ve got four costumes, including a redcoat and an admiral, and Nili has several gowns. They look pretty authentic. Of course, we don’t dress up for the regular meetings, just the balls, but it’s great to see people in their finery.”

Mira Magdo, 31, blogger, Cambridge:

“Four years ago, I moved to England to be close to Jane – it sounds weird but it’s true. Each year, there’s a big festival in Bath. One year, I was there and Adrian Lukis, who played Wickham in the BBC version, was there too, and I had the idea of trying to meet every major cast member.”

Are you an Austen superfan on this level? We have to say, it was great to see so many of these fans visiting us in Bath for the photoshoot!

The full article can be read here.


The Pros and Cons of P&P Deviation

There’s been a fair bit of concern (but also excitement) at the news that a new TV adaptation of Pride and Prejudice is on the cards for 2020 – a new adaptation that the production’s writer says will show ‘the darker side’ of Austen’s book. With this concern for the integrity of the book fresh in the minds of Austen fans, Verily magazine published a most welcome article this week reminding us that not all deviations are bad.

Some of the positive deviations from the book included Darcy’s rain-drenched proposal in the 2005 P&P film, Mr Darcy’s bathtub scene in the 1995 mini series, and, naturally, Mr Darcy’s wet shirt scene from the same miniseries.

However, we were also reminded of a few less welcome changes. A few of these were from the 1940 film version of Pride and Prejudice. For example: the wildly inaccurate costumes, the horse and carriage race between the Bennets and the Lucases, and the kind and understanding Lady Catherine!

We read the article, were reminded of the versions which we had chosen to forget, and remembered that it would all be OK in the end, because after all, if the new production of Pride and Prejudice is less than favorable, we will always always have Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle’s stellar performances to fall back on!

 


 Meet The Menopausal Side of Jane Austen?

We came across an article by journalist Frances Wilson this week which surprised us somewhat. Her article focused on the lack of literature which explores the menopausal women – women “caught in the midst of their own reckless years, burning-up, drying-out, death-obsessed and wondering whether they will ever desire, or be desired again”.

Wilson argues that there are plenty of novels and discussions in everyday life about men’s midlife crises, but the female equivalent in the last taboo. All is not lost though. Jane Austen is one author who, Wilson said, does write about menopausal women.

Look at Mrs Bennet in Pride and Prejudice, locked inside her high anxiety and lack of purpose, Lady Bertram in Mansfield Park, passed out on the sofa for reasons unexplained…

…Jane Austen, who died aged 42, may have been through the menopause herself – it often comes earlier to childless women – and Mansfield Park, darker, angrier and less forgiving than her other works, reads like that fictional unicorn, a menopausal novel.

That got us at the Jane Austen News to thinking – was Mansfield Park really a menopausal novel as this article makes out?

After some consideration, we were left unconvinced, but we do like Wilson’s argument that it would be nice to see more menopausal seize-the-day female characters in novels and that, currently, there’s a bit of a lack.


Success For Student Who Learned English From Austen

Horem Gul, a teenager who arrived in Nottingham from Pakistan a year ago learned her English in what is possibly the most enjoyed way we’ve ever come across. She, her mum, and her younger sister, came to England to join her father, who’s been working in the UK for the past ten years. The family came with very little English. Happily Jane Austen (and Colin Firth) were happy to help…

“We all came together about a year ago. We watched a lot of movies which helped us adapt and I got my English from the movies like Pride and Prejudice!”

Horem has since had fantastic exam results despite the newness of the language. She achieved two A and three B grade A levels! A great example of how Austen is inspiring women to achieve great things in their lives even all these years after her death.


Jane Austen Day with Charlotte

Jane Austen News is our weekly compilation of stories about or related to Jane Austen. Here we will feature a variety of items, including craft tutorials, reviews, news stories, articles and photos from around the world. If you’d like to include your story, please contact us with a press release or summary, along with a link. You can also submit unique articles for publication in our Jane Austen Online Magazine.

Don’t miss our latest news – become a Jane Austen Member and receive a digest of stories, articles and news every week. You will also be able to access our online Magazine with over 1000 articles, test your knowledge with our weekly quiz and get offers on our Online Giftshop. Plus new members get an exclusive 10% off voucher to use in the Online Giftshop.

Save

Save

Save

Save

6 thoughts on “Jane Austen News – Issue 82

  1. I wonder if I’m the only one who considers the appended statement absolute nonsense? I don’t read much in the way of “women’s literature” and I’m glad I don’t. Nobody ever told me that I was drying up, or wearing an invisibility cloak as Wilson says in her article; no one ever told me that I’d automatically get old, cross a Rubicon, or have “a deep sense of change within.” I never feel that “I have a permanently closer companionship with death”. Thanks to my ignorance, I’ve remained as vital and visible as ever, grateful for the near disappearance of migraine headaches and that awful black mood that descended on me once a month for days at a time.

    “caught in the midst of their own reckless years, burning-up, drying-out, death-obsessed and wondering whether they will ever desire, or be desired again”.

    1. @ladylou – Hear, hear! I had a partial hysterectomy at age 46 after years of once-a-month debilitating pain and the other various unpleasantness that accompanied it. I felt reborn afterward, certainly not as if I had a “permanently closer companionship with death.”

  2. For a feisty take on Mrs Bennet. see Mrs. Bennet’s Sentiments. Was the top fiction pick by People Magazine this past November . JANE AUSTEN’S MOTHER TELLS ALL

    Jane Austen’s Mrs. Bennet, mother of five difficult teenage daughters is silent no more. Those who grew up enjoying Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice will delight in Mrs. Bennet’s Sentiments. Tired of having her ungrateful girls roll their eyes at her and watching her husband retreat to his man cave, Mrs. Bennet finally tells her side of the story.“ Mrs. Bennet surprises them all. She defies the conventions of the day…
    proving the old adage ‘Mother knows best.’ ”
    To Purchase
    https://www.createspace.com/6197005 or amazon.com

    I loved this recent article by Dunphy… She really gets it.
    SENT TO ME BY MY READERS. TOTAL VINDICATION OF MY PORTRAYAL OF MRS. BENNET
    IN MRS BENNET’S SENTIMENTS : PRIDE PREJUDICE AND PERSEVERANCE

    JANE AUSTEN’S MOST WIDELY MOCKED CHARACTER IS ALSO HER MOST SUBVERSIVE
    IN DEFENSE OF PRIDE AND PREJUDICE’S MRS. BENNET
    July 18, 2017 By Rachel Dunphy
    Of all the delightful idiots filling the pages of our well-worn copies of Pride and Prejudice(hint: this is everyone except maybe Charlotte), one of the best is also one of the most overlooked—even by Jane Austen, who never grants her a first name. Mrs. Bennet, mother to the five Bennet sisters and incorrigible social gadfly, is largely dismissed by both the book’s readers and its facetious narrator, but she is perhaps the most radical character in the novel.
    She tends to be read at face value—flighty, talkative, too often drunk, and too obsessed with marrying off each of her daughters. The clever jokes her husband makes at her expense go right over her head, much to his amusement and her elder daughters’ disappointment. But the willful disregard Mrs. Bennet shows to the sensibility and decorum most of her compatriots value so highly is not her weakness but in fact her greatest strength.
    The woman has one abiding goal through the novel: to see all her daughters married and thus financially secure. An entail demands that none of her five children, all girls, may inherit their father’s estate, and thus they will have no permanent home or source of income unless they find it in wealthy men. Through the homogenizing fog of history, her obsession sometimes feels ridiculous—but when the options are marriage or destitution, and when you live in the countryside where well-bred men are scarce, and when at least two of your daughters are already past prime marriageable age, panic is understandable. Love is lovely, but Mrs. Bennet’s mission is about survival.
    Unlike the rest of the family, prattling about feelings and manners and values and wit (yes, I mean you, Lizzie), she takes the plight of her children seriously, and she works tirelessly to ensure their futures. She schemes endless scenarios to endear her daughters to men of means, at one point orchestrating Jane’s prolonged illness (and thus residence) at Mr. Bingley’s Netherfield estate, at another attempting to force Elizabeth into an unhappy marriage with her cousin Mr. Collins, and at every chance throwing Lydia and Kitty toward an endless parade of military officers. Not all of her efforts are successful, to be sure, but marriage is a numbers game, and the Bennet matriarch is the sole, the necessary pragmatist in a house filled with idle dreamers.
    “Love is lovely, but Mrs. Bennet’s mission is about survival.”

    Remarkably, even as she shoulders the burden of her family’s future alone, Mrs. Bennet rails against the confines of the misogynistic society she inhabits. When she exclaims angrily, repeatedly, unceasingly about her daughters’ inability to inherit property—“the hardest thing in the world,” she calls it—our heroines, Jane and Lizzie, exhaustedly explain the logic of the sexist concept yet again. “They had often attempted to do it before, but it was a subject on which Mrs. Bennet was beyond the reach of reason, and she continued to rail bitterly against the cruelty of settling an estate away from a family of five daughters, in favor of a man whom nobody cared anything about.” How silly was this mother of theirs, who couldn’t understand the simple, obvious absurdity of a woman inheriting a house.
    Jane and Lizzie are far from oblivious to their perilous situation. They know they must marry before they are forcibly removed from their ancestral home by the combined powers of tradition and the aforementioned aggressively dull male cousin. They know that, in their early twenties, their eligible years are coming to a close. But they neither rebel against the injustice nor actively seek to nullify it. Neither is bitter about the entail; it is an unavoidable consequence of fate. And neither takes an active role in husband hunting, instead preferring to stumble lazily—and in Lizzie’s case quite resistantly—into blissful marriages with wealthy best friends (Congrats! Glad it all worked out). When Elizabeth’s longtime friend Charlotte marries the rejected Mr. Collins, Lizzie is embittered to see the slightly older woman compromise her standards for security—but the matter of Charlotte’s inheriting her home and all its worth is a non-issue. Her mother sees it differently and bitterly condemns Collins and Charlotte at every opportunity, even years after their marriage. There is nothing she can do to change the legal status of herself or her daughters, but still she refuses to accept it, and she will not be quiet about the injustice of it even while those who it affects most consider the matter settled and have found superior situations. Mrs. Bennet is revolutionary in her simple and abiding refusal to shut up, even as those for whom she chiefly advocates desperately wish for her do so.
    While working within a system she openly acknowledges to be against her, Mrs. Bennet acts freely and without restraint. She speaks her mind regardless of whether it is time for her to speak, and she voices her opinion regardless of whether it is the popular one—“What is Mr. Darcy to me, pray, that I should be afraid of him?” she asks in response to another of Lizzie’s scoldings, “I am sure we owe him no such particular civility as to be obliged to say nothing he may not like to hear.” It’s a trait she passes on to her favorite and youngest daughter, Lydia, and the two make a regular habit of interrupting and interjecting in conversations with their social betters. Mrs. Bennet isn’t afraid of mistakes, frequently acting with what is judged as too much liberty but never once embarrassed or apologetic for it. And that is remarkable given how highly reputation is valued in her world and how little it takes to destroy one.
    Let us not forget that the dramatic height of the novel revolves around the horrific realization that Lydia, the youngest and silliest Bennett sister, may have pre-marital sex—and that if she does, the entire family will be destitute. Of course it is not Austen as much as the period in which she wrote that is the problem here. Fifteen years old, Lydia is only saved from assured ruin through the help of a rich male benefactor, Mr. Darcy. He acts not from any sense of morality or charity—he at first finds a possible association with Lydia so despicable as to prevent him proposing to her sister—but out of love for another, better-behaved woman and the need to protect his own reputation by association.
    After her marriage, Lydia is all but ostracized by her father and her sisters simply because she has the audacity not to be ashamed. Mr. Bennet, who sent the notoriously flirtatious Lydia to spend poorly supervised months with a bunch of soldiers in the first place, is content to publicly cut ties with his daughter and her husband solely out of spite. Her actions seem to be equally condemned by Austen—she and Mr. Wickham are acknowledged as a point of fact to be unhappy and unstable long term. Though Lizzie and Jane advocate for Lydia, arguing the disavowal would only hurt the family more, it is largely for the sake of their mother, who persists in loving Lydia, who (silly woman) is proud of her daughter, that she is allowed to return home at all.

    “Lizzie is an excellent woman of her era, but she lives within the boundaries of her place in society and doesn’t expect more for herself or from others.”Lydia is oblivious and vain, obviously, but the small, selfish idiocies of teenagers are deserving of light mockery and forgiveness, not permanent condemnation. The youngest Bennet daughter’s girlish ridiculousness is timeless, but her mother’s decision not to ostracize her for her sexual misconduct—or even to acknowledge it as such—is quintessentially modern. It is a path few other Austen parents take.
    That refusal to blame is not just kind but revolutionary. While the rest of her relations are prepared to mercifully tolerate Lydia’s marriage, her mother won’t do anything short of delight in it. As the first rule of polite society is never to insult someone to their face, the family has little choice but to publicly endorse her felicity. Despite Elizabeth’s private disgust that even after nearly destroying her future “Lydia was Lydia still; untamed, unabashed, wild, noisy and fearless,” she refrains from demeaning their behavior. She goes so far as to make peace with Wickham, who she worthily hates, solely to avoid any hint of a straightforward confrontation within the family. Because Lizzie at her core is absolutely traditional, as are her values and her limitations. She speaks in subtleties designed to amuse her allies and confuse her targets, not to openly challenge. She is embarrassed by the shabbiness and flightiness of her relations and fears her association with them diminishes her worth. “Had her family made an agreement to expose themselves as much as they could during the evening,” she thinks to herself during the Netherfield ball, “it would have been impossible for them to play their parts with more spirit or finer success.”
    Lizzie is an excellent woman of her era, but she lives within the boundaries of her place in society and doesn’t expect more for herself or from others. She succeeds in forging her path to happiness and prosperity, but it is a personal victory only, one that reinforces the oppressive system that she accepts without question.
    The victories of her mother and sister are of a much more significant character. Though both behave in a way that is unacceptable according to the standards of their society, by simply refusing to care or notice these transgressions, they force those who do to go to extraordinary lengths to accommodate them. As much out of self-preservation as out of love, Lydia’s older sisters and their husbands spend the rest of their lives supporting her both financially and socially, frequently sending her money and hosting her in their mansions. Lydia has little regard for her own respectability, but as her status reflects on theirs, Jane and Lizzie must provide her with some of their own, and so Lydia continues to do exactly as she wants without ever sacrificing the comforts or pleasures she might have otherwise found.This youngest daughter is thus Mrs. Bennet’s true heir, doing always what she wants over what she should, and using shame as a tool rather than allowing it to control or diminish herself. It is a bold, a risky path that can only be trod by those with the bravery and confidence to believe themselves worthy without validation, to demand what they want from life rather than accepting every injustice as fate. These are values Lydia learned from her mother, values she will teach to her daughters, and it is their legacy, their radical impropriety, that shapes the future.

  3. A member of the Jane Austen Society Kent Branch, a few years back, wrote a P&P variation called Mrs Bennet’s Menopause, so Lucy Kate King was on to this years ago! It’s available on kindle if you’re interested 🙂

    1. I wrote Mrs. Bennet’s Sentiments with copyright in 2010. I had submitted a rough draft to Deb W in 2009 at Source Books. She got back to me in 24 hrs! She wanted to pitch it. A week later she couldn’t get the full editorial board to give it the green light as they do more romantic spin-offs… Darcy etc… and this is “Hen Lit” But she strongly encouraged me to continue. Then I attended a writer’s conference and met with many editors agents etc..2011. I saw that Ms. King’s book I think came out in 2013..but I didn’t read it. Was thinking oh Dang I tipped my hand… After many rounds with agents etc. . I formally published it in time for Mother’s Day 2016. I read Gilbert’s Big Magic and realize those inspiration sprites are everywhere.Maybe great minds think a like. I saw Mrs. Bennet Has Her Say but it was very dissimilar, focused on her as a young woman I think. Only read a few pages in. Will check out King’s book. Right now in pre- production for a big show about Matisse( I run a theatre)

  4. […] Jane Austen News – Issue 82 – Jane Austen Centre […]

Leave a Reply