Posted on

Ponderous Obsequity

Ponderous Obsequity


Mr. Collins As a Mirror Held to the Face of Society

In Pride and Prejudice, Mr. Collins, with his pompous, obsequious ways, is easy to overlook as mere comic relief. Contemplation of the hero and heroine and their romantic relationship with its twists and turns is so much more appealing. I wonder though, if, in dismissing Mr. Collins too quickly, we fail to recognize Jane Austen’s genius for comic satire. The simple juxtaposition of Mr. Collins in vivid and humorous interaction with the other characters in a coherent story line is a major accomplishment of invention. Jane Austen, however, fashions more than amusement into her creation of his character.

Lady Catherine and Flunky
Mr. Collins is displayed by Mr. Bennet’s satirical humor in as sharp a relief as the silhouettes of the time. Elizabeth’s alternate amusement and embarrassment at Mr. Collin’s hands displays the ridiculous position of a woman pursued by a man of inferior mind and manners, if not social position. Likewise, Charlotte Lucas is forced to choose between life as a spinster in the home of her younger brother and marriage to a man she cannot either respect or love. Mr. Collins is the key agent Miss Austen uses to measure and reveal her characters. The outrageously ridiculous dinner scene involving Mr. Collins’s obsequious praise of Lady Catherine de Bourgh and his overawed father-in-law Sir William Lucas echoing his words at Lady Catherine’s table takes satire to a knife sharp edge that places rank and wealth in perspective. In a word rank and wealth without education, judgment, and the ability to laugh at one’s self are ridiculous. To quote another Jane Austen character’s satiric comment on society from her book Persuasion:

“Good company requires only birth, education, and manners, and with regard to education is not very nice.”

I am awed by Jane Austen’s masterful use of her creation, Mr. Collins, to satirize the preoccupation of society with wealth and rank, and demonstrate the extremely limited choices for women.

Mr. Collins as a member of the clergy is himself representational of marriage, a topic that is thoroughly examined in Pride and Prejudice. Mr. Collins is both an agent for the performance of a marriage and a person whose respectability and position would be enhanced by his own marriage. Jane Austen parades a diverse group of marriages before the reader and examines each with her lucid depiction. In an approach that is the reverse of Mr. Collins style, she strives to draw us into a consideration of marriage with humor and spare words.

Mr. Collins
Jane Austen had so abundant a well to draw her humor from, that she could afford to use some very good moments as mere throw away lines. When Mr. Collins reads aloud to the Bennet’s after dinner he chooses Fordyce’s Sermons, a book, well-known at the time for preaching correct behavior to young ladies. The headstrong Lydia quickly interrupts his attempt to sermonize to his host’s daughters. The scene might have been drawn out for pages, but is kept to a smile provoking couple of paragraphs by the author. Jane Austen has been criticized for being too spare in her writing. However, her work has stood the test of time better than her Victorian critics. Her abundant creativity enhanced by her spare well-honed prose is almost haiku like in richness of meaning and forward momentum. The next time you read Pride and Prejudice take a moment to consider Austen’s use of Mr. Collins in the story line.


Sharon Wagoner is the webmistress of The Georgian Index. Visit her site for a treasure trove of little known information about the Georgian period. A fascinating collection!

Enjoyed this article? Browse our book shop at janeaustengiftshop.co.uk

Want to read the full article?

Sign up for free Jane Austen Membership or if you are an existing user please login

Existing Users Log In
   
Sign up here to become a Jane Austen member
*Required field

Comments are closed.